In a significant development, the Kayseri 2nd Assize Court has reaffirmed the conviction of Mr. Yüksel Yalçınkaya, defying a previous ruling by the ECHR. This decision comes despite the Grand Chamber’s judgment, which found that Türkiye had violated Articles 6, 7, and 11 of the European Convention.
Dr. Yasir Gökçe, Türk İstihbaratının kendi raporunu kullanarak, Bylock kanıtlarının kalitesine ilişkin meşru endişeleri ortaya koyan çeşitli veri manipülasyonu örneklerini göstermektedir. Bu endişeler, AİHM’in Yalçınkaya davasındaki bulgularıyla birleştiğinde, Türk mahkemelerinin Bylock’un delil olarak kabul edilebilirliğini yeniden değerlendirmesini gerektirmektedir.
Using Turkish Intel’s own report, Dr Yasir Gokce demonstrates several instances of data manipulation, raising legitimate concerns about the quality of Bylock evidence. Such concerns, coupled with the ECHR’s findings in the Yalcinkaya case, require Turkish courts to re-evaluate the admissibility of Bylock as evidence.
In two cases, ECHR found that the detention of 366 individuals unlawful and awarded more than €1 Million in compensation.
Bylock prosecutions & Yüksel Yalçınkaya v. Turkey judgment of the ECHR: We have prepared a video for you going into details of the Court’s reasoning dealing with #Quality #Reliability of #DigitalEvidence
A panel of experts discussed the Yalçınkaya vs. Turkey judgment, shedding light on systemic human rights issues, challenges of digital evidence, and the implications of such a landmark ruling.